ABSTRACT This article examines the structural architecture of the Indian economy, demonstrating why a mixed economic model is uniquely suited to its socio-economic fabric, while pure capitalistic or socialistic configurations fail to address its core
Law school gives us knowledge, but mentors give us direction. Recently, I had the opportunity to work on a Public Interest Litigation before the Delhi High Court concerning accessibility barriers in the DDA Jan Sadharan
Abstract The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDP Act) introduces significant changes to India’s data governance framework, raising concerns about its impact on the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act). This article examines
Case Title: – REJANISH K.V. vs. K. DEEPA [Civil Appeal No(s). 3947/2020] and other connected matters Date :- 23.09.2025 The Supreme Court began its Constitution Bench hearing on the issue of whether a judicial officer,
Date:- 12.09.2025 Notice No:- HCKL/ 9081 /2025-A7 The Hon’ble Kerala High Court has recently issued a notice informing about its decision to incorporate WhatsApp messaging as an additional feature in its Case Management System
Date: 18.09.2025 Citation: WTM/KV/CFID/CFID-SEC1/31672/2025-26 Coram: KAMLESH C. VARSHNEY (Whole Time Member -SEBI) In a significant development, the Securities and Exchange Board (SEBI) has given a clean chit to Adani Group and its Chairman Gautam
Case:- Sharjeel Imam vs State of NCT of Delhi and Gulfisha Fatima vs State of NCT of Delhi Citation:- Diary No: 50847/2025; Diary No. 50992/2025 Date:- 06.09.2025 Sharjeel Imam and Gulfisha Fatima have moved
Date:- 13.05.2025 On 13.05.2025, President Droupadi Murmu has, under Article 143, in a 14 point reference to the Hon’ble Supreme Court has asked the Hon’ble Court whether it can impose a 3 months for
Date:- 20.08.2025 Case No.:- CCPA-2/35/2024-CCPA In the matter of – Misleading advertisement and unfair trade practice by Rapido (Roppen Transportation Services Pvt Ltd). Transportation Services Important Takeaways:- Rapido ran a campaign saying – “Auto
Date:- 26.08.2025 Important Takeaways:- Justice BV Nagarathna strongly dissents against elevation of Justice Pancholi, calling it “counterproductive” and damaging the judicial credibility. making the collegium spit to 4:1 Justice Pancholi is 57th in
Law office of Lily Thomas and Saju Jakob has been advocating for upholding individual rights, human dignity and ensuring public accountability through PILs, Writs and other legal remedies in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and several High Courts.
178, Engineers’ Estate, I.P Extension, New Delhi-110092
> Mon - Sat, 9:00 AM – 7:30 PM
