• ✉ > office@lilythomas.org
Facebook X-twitter Linkedin Instagram

Division Bench

Section 498 A To Be Applicable To “Live-In Relationships” That Qualify As “Relationships In The Nature Of Marriage” : Supreme Court

Adv. & solicitor Saju Jakob - Lily ThomasComment on Section 498 A To Be Applicable To “Live-In Relationships” That Qualify As “Relationships In The Nature Of Marriage” : Supreme Court

Case Name: Dr. Lokesh B.H. & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Anr.Petition No: Crl.A. No. 003647 – 003648 of 2026.Neutral Citation: 2026 INSC 784Date of Judgement: 03.08.2026Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol and Hon’ble

FIRs RELATING TO SEPARATE TRANSACTIONS DISCLOSING DISTINCT OFFENCES CANNOT BE SAID TO ARISE OUT OF THE SAME TRANSACTION: SUPREME COURT

Adv. & solicitor Saju Jakob - Lily ThomasComment on FIRs RELATING TO SEPARATE TRANSACTIONS DISCLOSING DISTINCT OFFENCES CANNOT BE SAID TO ARISE OUT OF THE SAME TRANSACTION: SUPREME COURT

Case Name: Rutvij Bhagat Singh Wakhare v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.Petition No.: Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 127 of 2026Neutral Citation: 2026 INSC 740Date of Judgement: July 24, 2026Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol

Last Seen Circumstance Not Sufficient to Record Conviction Unless Time Gap With Discovery of Dead Body of Deceased Is Negligible: Supreme Court

Adv. & solicitor Saju Jakob - Lily ThomasComment on Last Seen Circumstance Not Sufficient to Record Conviction Unless Time Gap With Discovery of Dead Body of Deceased Is Negligible: Supreme Court

Case Name: Didar Singh @ Dari v. State of Haryana (along with Ranjeet Singh @ Jeeta v. State of Haryana) Petition No.: Criminal Appeal No. 1148 of 2013 with Criminal Appeal No. 786 of 2017 

MERELY BECAUSE THE TICKET OF A TRAIN JOURNEY WAS NOT FOUND ON THE PERSON OF THE DECEASED, WILL NOT CHANGE HIS STATUS AS A BONA FIDE PASSENGER: SUPREME COURT

Adv. & solicitor Saju Jakob - Lily ThomasComment on MERELY BECAUSE THE TICKET OF A TRAIN JOURNEY WAS NOT FOUND ON THE PERSON OF THE DECEASED, WILL NOT CHANGE HIS STATUS AS A BONA FIDE PASSENGER: SUPREME COURT

Case Name:  LATA V UNION OF INDIAPetition No.: Special Leave Petition(Civil) No. 30726 of 2025Neutral Citation: 2026 INSC 715 Date of Judgement: 17.07.2026Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar SinghRelevant

ALL STATES AND UNION TERRITORIES TO FORMULATE AND NOTIFY A COMPREHENSIVE POLICY FOR EARLY RELEASE OF PRISONERS WHO ARE OF ADVANCED AGE AND / OR TERMINALLY ILL: SUPREME COURT

Adv. & solicitor Saju Jakob - Lily ThomasComment on ALL STATES AND UNION TERRITORIES TO FORMULATE AND NOTIFY A COMPREHENSIVE POLICY FOR EARLY RELEASE OF PRISONERS WHO ARE OF ADVANCED AGE AND / OR TERMINALLY ILL: SUPREME COURT

Case Name: NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY VS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petition No.: WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO(S). 162 OF 2025 Neutral Citation: 2026 INSC 713 Date of Judgement: 16.07.2026Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and

MERE EXISTENCE OF TREES ON A PORTION OF SUBJECT LAND CANNOT IPSO FACTO ELEVATE IT TO THE STATUS OF A “FOREST” OR “DEEMED FOREST”: SUPREME COURT

Adv. & solicitor Saju Jakob - Lily ThomasComment on MERE EXISTENCE OF TREES ON A PORTION OF SUBJECT LAND CANNOT IPSO FACTO ELEVATE IT TO THE STATUS OF A “FOREST” OR “DEEMED FOREST”: SUPREME COURT

Case Name: ALOK KOTAHWALA & ORS. vs. JAIPUR METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS.Petition No.: Civil Appeal No.8269 Of 2026Neutral Citation: 2026 INSC 682Date of Judgement: 13.07.2026Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon’ble Mr.

CONVICTION FOR DOWRY DEATH CANNOT BE SUSTAINED ON MERE ALLEGATIONS WITHOUT RELIABLE EVIDENCE: SUPREME COURT

Adv. & solicitor Saju Jakob - Lily ThomasComment on CONVICTION FOR DOWRY DEATH CANNOT BE SUSTAINED ON MERE ALLEGATIONS WITHOUT RELIABLE EVIDENCE: SUPREME COURT

Case Name: BRAJESH KUMAR @ BIRJESH KUMAR SINGH VS THE STATE OF BIHARPetition No.: Criminal Appeal No. 3117 of 2026 Neutral Citation: 2026 INSC 695 Date of Judgement: 13.07.2026Coram: Hon’ble Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon’ble Justice

EXONERATED LITIGANT ENTITLED TO MASKING OF PERSONAL IDENTIFIERS FROM COURT’S DIGITAL RECORDS: BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Adv. & solicitor Saju Jakob - Lily ThomasComment on EXONERATED LITIGANT ENTITLED TO MASKING OF PERSONAL IDENTIFIERS FROM COURT’S DIGITAL RECORDS: BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Case Name: ABC vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRAPetition No.: Criminal Writ Petition No. 470 Of 2026Neutral Citation: 2026:BHC-NAG:8407-DB Date of Judgement: 03.07.2026Coram: Hon’ble Ms. Justice Nivedita P. Mehta and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke Relevant

About Law Office

Law office of Lily Thomas and Saju Jakob has been advocating for upholding individual  rights, human dignity  and ensuring public accountability through PILs, Writs and other legal remedies in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and several High Courts.

Facebook X-twitter Linkedin Instagram
Quick Links
Contact Info

178, Engineers’ Estate, I.P Extension, New Delhi-110092

  • ☏ > +91 9667661678
  • ☏ > +91 76784 83517
  • ✉ > office@lilythomas.org
  • 🕗 > Mon - Sat, 9:00 AM – 7:30 PM
Other Links

Copyright © 2026 Lily Thomas. Powered by Lily Thomas