Division Bench

NO DISTINCTION BETWEEN SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL PARTY TO INVOKE SECTION 9 OF THE ARBITRATION ACT: SUPREME COURT

Case Name: HOME CARE RETAIL MARTS PVT. LTD. V. HARESH N. SANGHAVI  Petition Number: CIVIL APPEALS ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 29972/2015, SLP (C) NO. 26876/2014 AND NO. 11139/2020.  Neutral Citation: 2026 INSC 415 

Read More

ABSENCE OF INDEPENDENT WITNESSES DOES NOT QUASH CONVICTION ON SINGLE WITNESS TESTIMONY, IF IT IS RELIABLE: SUPREME COURT

  Case Name: ADALAT YADAV ETC. V. THE STATE OF BIHAR  Petition Number: CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1788-1789 OF 2019  Neutral Citation: 2026 INSC 403  Date of Judgement: 22.04.2026 Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL AND

Read More

FOREIGN JUDGEMENT REFUSING LEAVE TO DEFEND DOES NOT FALL WITHIN SECTION 13 CPC, CANNOT BE ENFORCED: SUPREME COURT

  Case Name: MESSER GRIESHEIM GMBH (NOW CALLED AIR LIQUIDE DEUTSCHLAND GMBH) V. GOYAL MG GASES PRIVATE LIMITED.  Petition Number: CIVIL APPEAL OF 2026 ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4774 OF 2023  Neutral Citation:

Read More